Capital punishment programs

School of Law About Us. School of Law Admissions. School of Law Admissions Prospective Students. School of Law Admissions Financial Aid. School of Law Admissions Admitted Students. School of Law Academics. School of Law Academics Academic Resources. School of Law Academics Degree Programs.

School of Law Academics Office of the Registrar. School of Law Student Life. School of Law Student Life Publications. School of Law Library. School of Law Library Services. School of Law Library Research and Reference. School of Law Library Technical Services. School of Law Library Information. School of Law Careers. School of Law Careers Home. School of Law Careers Students. School of Law Careers Employers.

School of Law Careers Alumni. School of Law Careers Employment Statistics. Even the administration of executions is utterly flawed: Every method of execution comes with an intolerably high risk of extreme pain and torture.

Public support for the death penalty is falling; the numbers of new death sentences and executions are both rapidly decreasing. The time has come for America to end this failed experiment. Several recent executions have proven that lethal injection can often be painful and prone to mishaps that lead to torture. In recent years, as pharmaceutical manufacturers have withdrawn permission to use their drugs in executions, states have frequently failed to find safe alternatives and been forced to shroud their executions under cloaks of secrecy.

The result has been a lack of accountability for state governments in relation to botched executions. The worst horror of the criminal justice system is the execution of an innocent person. Time and time again, evidence has shown an unacceptably high risk of convicting the innocent in a criminal justice system that is so flawed. That risk becomes particularly unacceptable when execution is at stake. Between and , there were exonerations of innocent people from death rows in the modern system.

Research suggests that the actual number of innocent people who have been sentenced to death is far higher and that one in every 25 defendants sentenced to death is likely innocent. The execution of a person with a mental illness or intellectual disability fails to advance any legitimate government purpose. Such disorders often heighten the possibility of a wrongful conviction or death sentence because the accused does not have access to resources to properly navigate the justice system.

A civilized society forfeits its moral authority by executing people with mental or intellectual disabilities. There is incentive for them to hide evidence favorable to the defense and offer juries false testimony. The death sentences that result from prosecutorial misconduct represent a gross perversion of justice and the height of arbitrariness.

Racial disparities, permanently intertwined with the death penalty in America because of its history of lynching, continue to taint capital punishment today. Study after study confirms that the race of the victim often drives death penalty decisions.