Subscribe To SSL. What is SSL? About SSL. Facebook-f Twitter Youtube Github. All rights reserved. Privacy Overview. Keeping these cookies enabled helps us to improve our website. Enable or Disable Cookies. Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences! Name Provider Purpose Expiration Google Analytics Google Collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.
Enable All Save Changes. Collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages. Be sure to open chat history!
As the lists can be quite long and will therefore not display in your screen. Furthermore, the song with the highest rating will make a chance to enter the top Default, the option to enter the top40 is enabled, this includes sending the Clubname and the DJ name to the top40 listing.
If you rather not want to send either the Clubname or DJ name, you can turn this off in the menu of the board, or disable the top40 option entirely. You would want to turn off your DJ name, if for instance it is illegal in your country to play certain music that is protected licensed music.
But of course it is best is to not play licensed music at all if this is not approved in your country. There is an option to enter your own avatar key UUID into the. This is not only a nice feature to see what ratings a DJ receive, but it can also be used as a check-up to see how long or even if a DJ played at all in your club when you are offline or not in the club.
A full modifiable script API is included in the board, which will make it possible to upload DJ Set statistics to your own website. Of course, it could also just be used for statistical purposes, to see for instance which DJs generate the most popular parties. With the statistics per DJ, used together with our VWB board , you could generate fairly exact figures on traffic versus music popularity to make a general "party success score" and filter out what DJs are more successful then others.
It must be noted however that you have to take into consideration that there are many unsteady factors like competitive clubs, djs, the amount of people online etcetera.
In addition, cases closed after litigation is initiated should be closed in this category when the program appears as counsel of record and an order of withdrawal or voluntary dismissal is entered or the case does not result in a negotiated settlement, administrative agency or court decision. This closure category should be reserved for cases in which the assistance the program provides clearly exceeds the amount of work that would be performed for CSR Closure Categories A—Counsel and Advice or B—Limited Action and no other closing code is appropriate e.
Factors that favor selection of CSR Closure Category L include but are not limited to: 1 a high level of factual complexity; 2 a highly sophisticated legal analysis; 3 drafting of non-routine original pleadings or legal documents; and 4 significant legal research. Although not controlling, grantees may also consider whether a substantial amount of time was charged to the case as evidence of extensive services.
Each closed case is to be assigned one of the following numeric Legal Problem Codes, which are grouped in ten broad Legal Problem Categories. Representation provided by law students, law graduates, and other professionals can qualify for CSR purposes only when the representation is provided before an administrative tribunal that permits non-attorneys to represent individuals before the tribunal.
However, it is appropriate to charge the time expended for the attempted referral to PAI. In cases in which a PAI referral is unsuccessful and program staff has not provided any legal assistance to the client, the file may not be closed as a CSR case. In cases in which a PAI case handler co-counsels a case with program staff, the case may be closed either as a PAI case or as a staff case but not both in the discretion of the program.
In cases in which both program staff and a PAI case handler provide legal assistance, but have not co-counseled the case, the program should close the case as a staff or a PAI case depending on whether the staff or the PAI case handler provided the highest level of legal assistance. For example, if a private attorney gave some advice and counsel and staff obtained a court order, the case should be closed as a staff case.
Through the use of automated case management systems and procedures, grantees shall ensure that cases involving the same client and specific legal problem are not recorded and reported to LSC more than once e.
Grantees shall ensure the timely closing of PAI cases so that case service reports submitted to LSC contain current and accurate information about both open and closed cases for the grant term typically January 1 through December While it is desirable to close all cases, including PAI cases, in the year in which the last legal assistance to the client was rendered, nevertheless all PAI cases of all types may be closed and reported either in the year in which legal assistance was completed or in the next grant year.
The substantive change from the pre Handbook is that rules for timeliness for compensated cases are now exactly the same as those for pro bono cases.
Grantees shall employ one or more methods of ensuring timely closing of PAI cases. A possible method includes the generation of case management reports that indicate the length of time PAI cases have been open. A review of such reports should establish whether cases are being timely closed. Grantees shall create oversight and follow-up systems and procedures sufficient to track the timely referral, follow-up, and disposition of PAI cases.
Hallmarks of effective oversight and follow-up systems and procedures include but are not limited to:. Recipients are permitted to use non-LSC funds to provide otherwise permissible services to a client who exceeds the Part financial eligibility limits, but the case may not be reported to LSC for CSR purposes. For example, if the program performs legal research but does not advise the client of the results of the research, this would not constitute a CSR-reportable case.
Similarly, if the program sends a letter to a client containing legal advice which is then returned to the program as undeliverable and the program has not orally advised the client , this also would not constitute a CSR-reportable case. A different definition of legal assistance appears in the LSC Act and regulations. LSC expanded Part to allow recipients to allocate costs to the PAI requirement associated with activities involving law students, law graduates, and other professionals in the delivery of legal information and legal assistance to eligible clients.
The scans must capture the visible data relevant to eligibility that appears on the documents including handwriting and signatures. See Footnote 27 regarding financial eligibility for domestic violence victims and exclusion of assets associated with an alleged abuser. See Footnote 24 regarding financial eligibility for domestic violence victims and exclusion of income associated with an alleged abuser.
If a program has already closed and reported a case in one calendar year, and the client returns for additional service in a subsequent calendar year, the program must report the additional service as a separate case in the subsequent year, provided that the case otherwise meets the requirements and definitions of this Handbook.
For example, counsel and advice provided for codes Custody—31 and Divorce—32 are one case because both codes are in the Family category. However, although it may not be technically case dispositive, a case closed after a TRO or similar interim order made on the merits has been entered, may be closed in this category when the litigation is not pursued further.
However, if the PAI case handler closed the advice and counsel case in May but did not report it as closed to the program until June , such case is untimely and cannot be reported in the CSR. Either the program or the PAI case handler may obtain the necessary documentation and conduct any necessary review. In the absence of closing information from the PAI case handler, information obtained from the court or other reliable source is sufficient.
Chapter II: Key Definitions 2. Hallmarks of sufficient technological capacity include: single entry of data; automated reporting that eliminates onerous and time consuming manual calculation or tabulation; the ability to readily review data and information from multiple perspectives; and the promotion of data integrity including assistance in identification of erroneous data.
The checking process may occur either: a at the point when cases are first entered into the case management system; or b at a later time when case information can be systematically reviewed, but before the cases are reported to LSC. Chapter IV: Reporting Requirements 4. Chapter V: Documentation Requirements 5. A citizenship attestation shall be stated as follows: I am a citizen of the United States: Signature of applicant. However, this presumption is rebutted and two or more cases may be reported if the legal issues are sufficiently different, as evidenced by the presence of legal issues that: i fall into different Legal Problem Categories, [34] such as Family and Housing; [35] ii fall into different Legal Problem Codes within eitherthe Individual Rights or Miscellaneous Legal Problem Categories; [36] iii involve different adverse parties, even if they are in the same Legal Problem Category or Code; or iv relate to substantially different underlying facts.
CSR Closure Category G—Negotiated Settlement With Litigation A case closed in which the program negotiated and reached an actual settlement on behalf of a client while a court or formal administrative action was pending should be closed as Negotiated Settlement With Litigation. CSR Closure Category H—Administrative Agency Decision A case closed in which the program represented a client in an administrative agency action that resulted in a case-dispositive decision by the administrative agency or body, after a hearing or other formal administrative process e.
CSR Closure Category I—Court Decision A case closed in which the program represented [45] a client in a court proceeding that resulted in a case dispositive decision made by the court should be closed as a Court Decision. CSR Closure Category L—Extensive Service not resulting in Settlement or Court or Administrative Action A case closed in which the program undertook extensive research, preparation of complex legal documents, extensive interaction with third parties on behalf of an eligible client, or extensive on-going assistance to clients who are proceeding pro se should be closed as Extensive Service.
The selection of appropriate closing codes by program staff for the legal assistance provided by PAI case handlers or review and approval by the program of closing codes selected by the PAI case handler. A program policy that articulates a plan to: 1 identify and periodically follow-up on all open PAI cases; and 2 administratively close untimely or dormant cases so that they are not included in future CSRs. Your Name. Your Email Address.
0コメント